Control Line: Navy Carrier

I was pleasantly surprised a few months ago when I received Carrier-related E-mail via the Internet. Receiving E-mail isn't unusual, and most of it is about modeling, so that wasn't out of the ordinary, either. The surprise was that the message was from Lieutenant Mike Danford. He was in the Arabian Gulf on the USS Carl Vinson, flying S-3 Vikings and looking forward to returning to San Diego before the end of 1996. By the time this issue reaches print, Mike should be in Southern California flying Carrier with the San Diego CL club. He was planning to build Melvin Schuette's Curtiss XF-13C for the .15 Carrier event.

Control Line: Navy Carrier

Wing Loading Revisited: The reason our current airplanes are significantly larger than the ones we flew 25 years ago is that slow speed is important to obtaining a good score. Our airplanes are larger because a lighter wing loading produces a better low speed. I pointed out the performance differences which were evident at the Nats in my last column. Because slow speed has a predominant role in determining overall flight score, the majority of our models are now built to a 44-inch wingspan limit. Because wing loading is determined by dividing weight by wing area, there are basically two ways to decrease wing loading: You can build a model lighter, and you can build a model larger. Building lighter has its limitations, and experience has shown that the best improvement in performance comes from building larger models.

Control Line: Navy Carrier

Nats Equipment: It's been a couple of years since I've done a comprehensive review of the equipment used at the Nats. I like to do those reviews periodically because I believe that they are useful for anyone planning new models or new engines. With the building season upon us, now is as good a time as any. There are many potentially successful choices for Navy Carrier equipment. The Carrier pilot's skill has a large influence on the score; good equipment isn't as critical as it is in other competition categories, such as Speed and Racing, but it's still required for maximum performance. It's possible for good piloting skills to overcome equipment disadvantages, but the equipment determines the ultimate limit in performance. With the level of competition at the Nats, models there indicate which equipment is performing well.

Control Line: Navy Carrier

What a great Carrier Nats! There were new models and new modelers; young modelers and old modelers (in experience, if not in age) who hadn't been seen at a Nats in quite a few years; there was a new event for old models, but not necessarily for old modelers; and most importantly, there was good competition, good sportsmanship, outstanding camaraderie, and a chance to catch up on what friends had been doing since the last Nats. Adding variety to the flightline this year were some new models, including a few new MO-1s, which added to the numbers of that popular design. In spite of the bonus that went into effect last year for multiengine models, all of this year's entries were single-engine types.

Control Line: Navy Carrier

AS THIS COLUMN is being written (early February) the Control Line Contest Board (CLCB) is preparing for a vote on the urgent proposal to restore the two-minute starting time allowance for multiengine models. (Editor's note: Steve Kaluf, AMA Technical Director, has confirmed that the proposal passed and is effective immediately.) Two basic proposals for the 1999 rules cycle were scheduled for a February 28 vote. You should expect the results in the Model Aviation you receive in June. Proposals that pass the initial vote will be subject to cross-proposals, which must be submitted by July 15. It is unfortunate that the schedule does not allow for discussion of cross-proposals at the National Aeromodeling Championships (Nats); perhaps an extension can be agreed upon in the Executive Council. Whatever the schedule, if you want to participate in the cross-proposal discussions and deliberations, contact Pete Mazur at 5 Windsor Court, Aurora IL 60504; (630) 466-4051. Pete chairs the Navy Carrier Advisory Committee to the CLCB.

Pages